Davide Castellani, Professor of International Business, explores the potential impact of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs announcement on businesses and consumers.

In a press conference at the White House Rose Garden, President Donald Trump unveiled new "reciprocal" tariffs on imports to the US. These tariffs range from 10% for countries with relatively lower tariffs on US goods to 46% on Vietnam and 49% on Cambodia. The UK was spared the highest tariffs and given the lowest “discounted” rate.

However, it is unclear whether this will be in addition to the confirmed 25% tariff on car exports to the US.

While this may prevent immediate UK retaliation, the move is still likely to harm the British industry. Some of the lost exports of UK business to the US may be redirected to other markets like the EU. If the EU retaliates with tariffs on some of the most imported products from the US (such as cars, aircraft, pharmaceutical products), the UK may pick up some of the resulting lost US export to the EU.

The key issues with Trump’s Tariffs

Trump’s announcement highlighted several key issues. One major concern is that tariffs are typically imposed on specific products, yet he applied a blanket tariff rate for each country. This method suggests an arbitrary way of aggregating different tariffs, making the policy less precise and potentially more damaging. A more strategic approach would have been to adopt a more surgical selection of tariffs aimed at specific goods, for which the US has suitable domestic substitutes.

Another issue is that while Trump claims foreign countries impose unfairly high tariffs on US goods, he failed to acknowledge that the US itself applies high tariffs on certain products. There was no mention of reducing these existing tariffs.

The rhetoric used during the announcement was also misleading. Trump implied that foreign countries single out the US for higher tariffs. In reality, most countries apply the same tariff rate to all trading partners under World Trade Organization (WTO) Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rules. While some countries maintain higher tariffs to protect their (mostly developing) economies, WTO rules have allowed global tariff rates to decrease significantly over time, including those that are charged on US exports.

Trump also reiterated the claim that foreign countries will pay for these tariffs, boosting US government revenue and allowing for tax cuts. However, in practice, tariffs are paid by US importers, who will likely pass the cost on to American consumers through higher prices. This will disproportionately affect lower-income households, while any potential tax cuts would likely benefit the wealthy—effectively shifting more economic burden onto working-class Americans.

Will the tariffs bring manufacturing jobs back to the US? 

  Continue reading here